Africa and The Current State of International Relations!

How Justified is It Role In Libya Operation?

As Africa has witnessed the NATO-Influenced fall of one of the best African governments in terms of bringing social-economic developments to it's people, Libya, the question remains how much this incident has open the eyes of many on how western powers may deceive UN and still be able to get away with it. How these states may violate international laws and still walk away free from them. What we have been able to see is that NATO as organisation of a specific integration block may interfere, take side and encourage a civil war as long as it is in their own foreign policy interests. Who still may stand and say there is fairness in International Law?

Africa Union- Is It's Importance & Voice Respected
in International Arena outside Africa?

Who may convince African states to believe that their sovereignty is protected in International Laws against super military blocks such as NATO? And I believe unless the International Community takes a hard stand and ensure that justice is also served to even to those who are believed are untouchables in international arena then certain members of the international relations such as Africa will always feel undermine when it comes to international justice.

A Victim of His Belief and Firm Stand
Against Imperialism?

Will NATO be held accountable by violating the No-Fly Zone? Will NTC & NATO be held accountable by the killing of Gaddafi instead of taking him to the Hague? What about Guantanamo bay?

Time will tell, but unless African states get united and give a united stand relating to various international relations challenges they are facing such as misrepresentation in the UN Security council in terms of Veto votes then this will not be the end of a long indirect African states sovereignty oppression. I used the word oppression because as long as the disrespecting of African Union by NATO in it's effort to solve the Libyan crisis peaceful that showed the maximum of the West disrespectful of African sovereignty when it comes to matters relating to their economical interests. 

Maybe it is difficult to blame nations that try hard to meet the interests of their foreign policies, but what about African states? What did we do in response of the violations we witnessed in a fellow African state? Or us too we were busy trying to protect the interests of our foreign policies? And with all these happening who may stand and justify the equality of states in-front of international laws?

How Much United Nations is United Nations?

Who may explain why the western media ignores much of violations against international laws conducted by western countries? In various ways it has been seen a normal thing for these nations to violate international laws and get away with it. Example of these includes international laws violated within the Iraq invasion and treatment of detainees, especially during the George Bush era, through which various UN Charter and Geneva Conventions articles were violated. But who cares? It is not Africa, right?

As a student of International Relations I believe there a serious need for a reformation in international relations, by ignoring these differences we might see great consequences in near future. For as long as international laws are now being seen as instruments to justify the invasions of weaker states only and letting the stronger ones getting away with whatever laws they violate then international community is getting into a barbaric nature of relations. Relations surrounded with fear and doubts, relations were by a state has no choice than to give away it's natural resources in fear of invasions under any cause and propaganda as it happened in Iraq or even through foreign influence and support of civil wars as in Libya. A situation were by sovereignty of a state remains to be a term in paper and empty words, but one that may be taken away by the mightier at any minute a state fails to agree to do and act as commanded by them.